🔗 Share this article

In a per curiam decision, the nation's top court permitted Texas to implement a newly configured congressional map that is projected to include as many as five additional Republican-leaning districts. The six-to-three order, issued on Thursday, upholds a request by the state to overturn a federal judge's ruling that had rejected the redistricting plan in November.

Justices' Rationale

The district court erroneously placed itself into an ongoing primary campaign, causing significant confusion and disrupting the sensitive balance of power in elections, the supreme court said in detailing its action.

That lower court had previously found that Texas had likely sorted voters based on their race – a act known as racial gerrymandering – when it adopted the boundaries. It had mandated the state to use the maps established after the last decennial survey for the upcoming election.

Stinging Opposition

In a sharply worded dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the court's decision. She argued that it disregarded the work of the lower court, noting that its decision was crafted by a judge selected by former President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan stated in a dissent co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, Today's ruling solidifies that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its increased favoritism, will control next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas citizens, unjustly, will be placed in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has stated year in and year out, is a breach of the law of the land.

National Map-Drawing Fight

This decision comes amid a countrywide battle over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in pushes to alter the U.S. House map to bolster a slim Republican majority. Ordinarily, boundary revision occurs after a new decade's census. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to initiate a bold mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year triggered a series of events among other states.

Republicans in including North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted redistricting plans that might create several additional GOP-friendly seats. Democrats, meanwhile, have responded with their own plans in states like California and Virginia, which could offset those potential gains.

Political Responses

The Texas attorney general welcomed the High Court's decision. In a comment, he said the order upheld Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that ensures representation aligned with Republicans. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he added.

Conversely, Democratic officials decried the outcome. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the head of a major party campaign committee.

A top Democratic leader argued the court had another time eroded its legitimacy by approving a racially gerrymandered map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he added.